Sprinkles is a huge Agatha Christie fan, so of course she was thrilled to see Caramel carrying around The ABC Murders, originally published in 1936. They are talking about the book today. As usual Sprinkles is taking notes and asking questions.

Sprinkles: I was so excited to see you reading an Agatha Christie book, Caramel! She is the best!
Caramel: Yeah, I can see that point of view, she is a pretty good writer.
S: Yay! So you liked the book! I mean, I know there are a lot of folks who would not consider Christie a serious literary figure, but I always enjoy her books and I think she is great at what she does.
C: Yup, she kept me guessing almost all the way to the end.
S: Was this your first Agatha Christie novel?
C: Nope. I had also read And Then There Were None when Marshmallow was reviewing it.
S: Ooh, that was a good one too. So, okay, back to The ABC Murders. I am sure I read this book but it must have been decades ago. And I do not remember much of the plot. Can you tell us a bit about it?
C: So Hercule Poirot receives a suspicious letter signed by “ABC”.
S: Oh, so this has Poirot as the main detective! That is cool! Go on.
C: Yes, so this letter tells him that there will be a murder in Andover, and then someone actually dies there, so Poirot goes to Andover to figure things out.
S: Poirot is Belgian, and often works with some British guy who writes about him, right? Kind of like Dr. Watson of Sherlock Holmes?
C: Yes. The main narrator is Arthur Hastings, and the book is written like he is recounting the story rather than living through it.
S: Apparently Hastings appears in quite a lot of Poirot mysteries. I suppose it is good to have a character like Hastings or Watson to tell us these stories about the genius detectives they are hanging out with and admire so much. This way the stories unfold naturally and we are in the dark about what is going on in the minds of these mysterious crime solvers until the very end.
C: Yeah, it’s like that, ‘cept Hastings ole’ fellow has quite the thinker on emself-
S: Wait, what are you saying? Please speak normally. You are not a British gentleman from the nineteen twenties.
C: Awww, ok, but that was fun! And I am only about a hundred years late! And not quite British… Anyways, the only difference is that Hastings is actually somewhat smart so he also figures some things out. Still it is clear to everyone including himself that he is not as smart as Poirot and is surprised when Poirot solves everything.
S: Yup, that agrees with my previous understanding of their relationship.

S: So tell me a bit more. Could you tell the book was almost a hundred years old?
C: Well, it is exactly ninety years old actually. The book read fine to me. I did not think they were using old fashioned words or anything. And it is supposed to be happening in between the two world wars, and I could not even tell that, really.
S: Yes, I think Christie’s language is clean and simple enough for us to not even notice it. Every now and then she uses a phrase that is unfamiliar to me, or she mentions something historical to me but contemporary to the story characters, but most of the time, I cannot tell at all that she wrote these things such a long time ago.
C: Yeah, that checks out. Though it seems that in these books the detective and other people sometimes use words that today’s people might not understand. Like some words or phrases that refer to the railway map in Britain at the time. Of course I didn’t know that till they explained what it was they were talking about. But most of the time, I could totally forget this was supposed to be happening in the 1920s. That was even before your time Sprinkles!
S: Yes, of course it was before my time. It was even before my parents’ time, Caramel.
C: Oopsie, or is that what you want me to think?
S: Okay, let us put aside any implications that I might be undead or-
C: Or a lich?!
S: Okay, let us not go there.
C: Sure, that’s what a lich would say.
S: Caramel! These seem like ideas more fit for Midnight’s reviews.
C: Oh yes, Midnight does like his fantasy books. But I like them too.
S: I know. You like playing Dungeons and Dragons, and various versions of it.
C: Actually these days, I prefer Pathfinder, which is really just D&D 3.5 edition.
S: True. But Agatha Christie tells stories that are in some sense a lot simpler. She manages to find evil in mainstream people living regular lives. Seems like she has no need to go fantastic.
C: That may be true for the books she has already written. But maybe when she begins to write new books, from BEYOND THE GRAVE?
S: Okay, I have a feeling it is getting too late for us to be talking about books sensibly.
C: That’s lich talk! Okay, okay, don’t get mad, I am kidding. But yes, you are probably right, it is getting late and it is a school night…
S: Yep. So let us wrap up this review. Do you think you might read other books by Christie at some point?
C: Sure. They are fun to read, and I do love solving puzzles!
S: Sounds great to me. Okay then, Caramel. What would you like to tell our readers?
C: Stay tuned for more book bunny reviews!









