Marshmallow reviews Philographics: Big Ideas in Simple Shapes by Genís Carreras

As she is getting older, Marshmallow has been getting more and more interested in philosophical ideas. Today she reviews Philographics: Big Ideas in Simple Shapes, written by Genís Carreras and published in 2013. Sprinkles, who is also interested in the book, is asking questions and taking notes.

Sprinkles: So Marshmallow, I am so excited you wanted to review this book!

Marshmallow: Always happy to make you happy!

S: Thank you! Okay, so can you tell us a bit about what this book is about?

M: Well, the title is kind of self-explanatory. The book is about philosophy, more specifically about a hundred or so philosophical terms. The author of the book, or rather the artist Genís Carreras, uses two pages, side by side, for each term. Sort of reminded me of the book I recently reviewed about logical fallacies (An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments by Ali Almossawi) in terms of the format.

S: I can definitely see that. So on each two-page spread, what do you see?

M: On the left page, there is a short, one-sentence definition of the term, apparently written by Chris Thomas, a friend of Carreras. And on the right side, there is a graphic depiction of the term, created by Carreras himself.

S: Oh, that kind of reminds me of a book Caramel reviewed way back: Opposites Abstract by Mo Willems.

M: Yes, you are right! But in that book there was no explanation, just a term on one side and a graphic on the other.

S: I guess that is why the Mo Willems book is more of a children’s book and this is not.

M: Yes, also this one has a lot of big ideas. The terms are all ordered in alphabetical order, and most of them are -isms. I mean, they are terms like feminism, optimism, realism, capitalism, nihilism, aestheticism, spiritualism, atomism, historicism, and so on.

S: Yes, this could be a really good dictionary of -isms.

M: Yes. But there are also some terms that don’t end with -ism that belong to philosophy. Like free will, extropy, dogma, and utopia.

S: I think maybe the definition of realism (“the philosophical view that asserts that reality is fundamentally based on, and is shaped by, ideas and mental experience, rather than material forces”) is not quite accurate, but one mistake in such a neat book is not a big deal.

M: Yes, I can see how the book’s definition of realism is not quite in line with what Wikipedia or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy say. But other than that, I think we did not find anything else that sounded off.

S: Yes, the project is an awesome idea. And I think it is carried out quite superbly.

M: Yes, I totally think so. The graphics are so simple, and yet, they are most evocative. And I really like the use of bright colors in most of them.

S: Did you know that Carreras has a website where one can see many of the graphics from the book?

M: No! But we should definitely put a link to it!

S: Of course. Here it is: https://studiocarreras.com/philographics

M: All in all, I think this is a really neat book and it would be a great starting point if you are interested in big ideas. Carreras offers us a great way to get introduced to these big -isms and the connections between them.

S: How so?

M: At the bottom of most pages, there are some symbols that tell you what philosophical field the term belongs to. Like politics, religion, metaphysics, and ethics. And sometimes there are page numbers to send you to ideas that are directly related to the term on the page.

S: I see. That is really neat! And I agree that this book can be a neat guide to getting into philosophy.

M: Yep!

S: So how would you rate this book?

M: I’d rate it 100%.

S: Sounds good! So let us wrap this review up. What would you like to tell our readers?

M: Stay tuned for more amazing reviews from the book bunnies!